3 Comments
User's avatar
Richard's avatar

I don't think we have a clue about mental illness vs ideology regarding Crooks. I will note that many people, including Donald Trump thought that Charlie Kirk was a future President.

Eric's avatar
Apr 28Edited

The first point is fair — we don’t have much concrete evidence yet on Thomas Crooks, so any conclusions about mental illness vs. ideology are speculative.

On the second point, I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Charlie Kirk was not a president or a serious presidential candidate, which is why he wasn’t included. The piece deliberately focused only on presidents and major presidential candidates. That was the scope.

mobius wolf's avatar

Don't you know, disagreeing with them is violence, so it's all justified. Check out the comment section at JOJO's https://jojofromjerz.substack.com/

eye opening